Ethical argument-Abortion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Ethical argument-Abortion - Essay precedentEthical claims and principles suggest that women should have a right to abort a fetus because pregnancy and tiddler birth is a personal matter and notwithstanding a woman has a right to watch her destiny. The issue of moral choice centers on the factor of meaningful human life or personality. From the biologic perspective, the fertilized egg is not a human being yet. The concept of individualization is not identified until the archetypical stages of cell division are completed. So, fetus is not an individual and a woman does not fracture human rights and does not kill a baby (Colker, 3). From the religious point of view, beginning with the premise that God infuses the head at the moment of conception, church maintains that e very unborn child must be regarded as a human person. The main controversy of his argument is that at what point it is morally wise to charge foetal life as human life. Too much stress on the fetus can leave a lone to an abstracting from the important role the womans body plays in the development of a child. In speaking of the view of convince critics that the status of the child is the most important issue to resolve in the abortion controversy, Marquis gives examples of perturb on animals (Stetson 101). The second controversy is that Marques states Presumably abortion could be justified in some circumstances, only of the loss consequent on failing to abort would be at least as commodious (Marquis). He does not take into account that women should have a right to abort a fetus as a preventive measure not to born cripples (physical or mental). In reality, nobody bequeath benefited from this new life a mother will suffer all her life raising up a disabled creature, a parasitic twin will not become a inn member able to work and lead an independent life. In this case, a fetus does not own psychological characteristics and is not entitled to have full moral status, and should be aborted ( Kramlich 7830. Therefore, pro-choice advocates like warren and Thomson believe that banning abortions without any exceptions is a cruel and unjustifiable practice. Probably, Marcuqy would respond that abortion is also very bad for the morality of society as a whole. Abortion is an easy way out, so it encourages promiscuousness and unprotected sex. The very notion of abortion is immoral because it ruins the whole concept of responsible parenthood. The society has the traffic to protect the life of its citizens. The right to life has been the foundation of the civilized society. It seems that the most persuasive argument of the pro-choice lobby is that sometimes pregnancy occurs due to deflower or incest. The most appropriate answer to this trouble is the state taking a firm ground with a view to decrease the rate of rape and incest. And, in fact, not all rape and abortion victims want abortion. On the one hand, the opponents state that if humankind are killed before birth, they are the same person as the other human beings (Stetson 32). The concept of violent death contradicts with all existed religious and moral practices. Some people are content to continue with the moral traditions in which they were raised, while others are drawn toward systems of belief that they find match their needs and perceptions of this spiritual dimensions. Fetuses seem to be like arbotraroly chosen human cells on some respects and like